RELIQUA

THE BOOKS

1 / 5

PROMISED

425.15 SOL

across 1 readable line

SETTLED

0.00 SOL

matched to a signature

OUTSTANDING

425.15 SOL

published, nothing found against it

UNREADABLE

plus 1 line in USD, totalled separately

THE REGISTER

2 LINES

No. 001

otcdesks.cash

Early minters who paid above the standard rate are owed the difference back.

OUTSTANDING

PROMISED

425.15 SOL

“The wallets that paid that price are owed the difference back — 425.15 SOL across 95 desks, 68 wallets.”

https://otcdesks.cash/refunds · READ 2026-08-30

SETTLED

0.00

No payment found.

The zero is their own published figure — “Refunded so far: 0.00 SOL. Wallets settled: 0/68” — not a walk of the refund wallet's history. If a refund has been paid without being recorded there, this line is wrong in their favour and we would want to know.

OUTSTANDING 425.15 SOL

No. 002

otcdesks.cash

The front page reports a running total already paid out to desk holders.

UNREAD

PROMISED

$104,825.22

“PAID TO HOLDERS $104,825.22”

https://otcdesks.cash/ · READ 2026-08-30

SETTLED

——

The rounds are on chain and can be summed, but we have not done it. Until each is matched to a signature, this figure is a claim we are repeating, not one we are confirming.

OUTSTANDING unknown — see above

READ, BUT NOT IN THE REGISTER

These are dissected and the findings are in hand. They are not entered, because a line here needs the sentence it rests on, quoted, with the date it was read. A finding I remember is not a finding I can show you.

gronix.financeDistribution checked and it holds — 0.000022 TSLAx per 1M across 21 of 22 sampled holders. There is no fixed sum promised, so there is nothing here to mark outstanding. The reward reserve stood at $3.26.

mnav.funThe published buyback wallet has never held a single $MNAV. That is a payment claim with no payments, but we have not yet quoted the sentence that makes the claim, and a line without its quote does not go in.

mydivvy.app“127 wallets on payroll” is really $DIVVY paying itself. Same reason: the finding is in hand, the verbatim quote and its date are not.

stockify.financeIts front page said “Pre-launch. No STFY market is live” against $387k of 24h volume. That is a false statement rather than an unpaid debt, so it belongs in a different instrument.

It is not an accusation of fraud.

A line marked OUTSTANDING says a published figure has not been matched to a signature. That is a gap in evidence, which is a different thing from a gap in intent, and this site never claims to know the second.

It is not a schedule.

Nothing here says when a promise falls due, because almost none of these promises came with a date. An old outstanding line is old; that is all the age means.

It is not complete.

It holds the claims we have read with our own eyes and quoted verbatim. A protocol absent from the register has not been cleared — it has not been read.

It does not hold anything and cannot recover anything for you.

Reading a debt does not collect it.

RELIQUA HOLDS 2 LINES ACROSS 1 SUBJECT. THAT IS NOT A PLACEHOLDER — IT IS EVERY CLAIM SO FAR READ WITH ITS OWN QUOTE AND ITS OWN DATE.